Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the fl-builder domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the bb-powerpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the feed-them-social domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wpmudev domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the bb-theme-builder domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the uabb domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Curt Cignetti's Hoosiers up to No. 5 in Latest College Football Playoff Rankings - Mega Sports News

Curt Cignetti’s Hoosiers up to No. 5 in Latest College Football Playoff Rankings

By Danielle Daniels

Curt Cignetti (courtesy IMAGN, photo by Ron Janzaruk of Herald-Times via USA Today Sports)

BLOOMINGTON, Ind. – One of three undefeated teams left in college football, the Indiana football program sits No. 5 in the third College Football Playoff rankings as announced by the CFP committee on Tuesday (Nov. 19).

The No. 5 ranking is the highest in the CFP era for Indiana. It marks the third-straight week in 2024 and the eighth time in program history that IU has appeared in the CFP rankings. In 2020, Indiana entered the CFP rankings at No. 12 for three weeks and sat No. 11 during the final two weeks of the selections that season.

The Big Ten saw five schools ranked and four programs in the top-5 of the third CFP rankings: Oregon (No. 1), Ohio State (No. 2), Penn State (No. 4), Indiana (No. 5) and Illinois (No. 25).

No. 5/5/5 Indiana (10-0, 7-0 Big Ten) travels to Columbus, Ohio, for a top-5 showdown with No. 2/2/2 Ohio State (9-1, 6-1 Big Ten) inside Ohio Stadium. The Hoosiers will then close out the season against Purdue in the annual battle for the Old Oaken Bucket on Nov. 30 at Memorial Stadium.

College Football Playoff Rankings – Nov. 19
1. Oregon (11-0)
2. Ohio State (9-1)
3. Texas (9-1)
4. Penn State (9-1)
5. INDIANA (10-0)
6. Notre Dame (9-1)
7. Alabama (8-2)
8. Miami (Fla.) (9-1)
9. Ole Miss (8-2)
10. Georgia (8-2)
11. Tennessee (8-2)
12. Boise State (9-1)
13. SMU (9-1)
14. BYU (9-1)
15. Texas A&M (8-2)
16. Colorado (8-2)
17. Clemson (8-2)
18. South Carolina (7-3)
19. Army (9-0)
20. Tulane (9-2)
21. Arizona State (8-2)
22. Iowa State (8-2)
23. Missouri (7-3)
24. UNLV (8-2)
25. Illinois (7-3)

 

COURTESY INDIANA ATHLETIC COMMUNICATIONS